• Red Cardinal News
  • Posts
  • George Soros, the NED, and Global Democracy: Puppet Master or Scapegoat?

George Soros, the NED, and Global Democracy: Puppet Master or Scapegoat?

In partnership with

In the shadowy realm of global politics and finance, few figures evoke as much intrigue and controversy as George Soros. The enigmatic billionaire behind the Open Society Foundations (OSF) stands at the crossroads of democracy and power, painted by some as a champion of human rights and by others as a mysterious puppet master orchestrating world events from behind the curtain. Recent revelations connecting him to the U.S.-funded National Endowment for Democracy (NED) have only deepened the intrigue surrounding his true motives and influence.

The NED, Soros, and the Democracy Game

The National Endowment for Democracy, established in 1983, operates as a critical instrument of U.S. foreign policy, channeling hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars toward "democracy promotion" worldwide. While claiming bipartisan neutrality, NED's board includes influential figures from both major political parties, extending its reach into nearly every corner of the globe.

Whispers and investigations suggest the relationship between NED and Soros's Open Society network runs deeper than mere collaboration. Reports and detailed analyses point to a complex web of coordination between these entities in shaping political narratives, controlling media messaging, and potentially influencing electoral outcomes across nations. Soros's prominent role in major NED conferences and their joint involvement in various "democratic transitions" - a term some interpret as code for regime change - raises questions about the true nature of their partnership.

The Billionaire's Shadow: Soros's Global Web

Through OSF, established in 1984, Soros has wielded extraordinary influence, distributing over $32 billion to causes ranging from education and public health to media freedom and criminal justice reform. His legacy includes founding the Central European University in Budapest and backing progressive prosecutors across America.

Yet this vast network of influence has transformed Soros into a figure of almost mythical proportions in global politics. Right-wing leaders like Viktor Orbán of Hungary and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey paint him as the mastermind behind mass migration schemes designed to erode national identities. In America, conservative voices frequently portray him as the hidden hand behind Black Lives Matter protests, anti-Trump demonstrations, and alleged election manipulation through his support of progressive district attorneys.

The Global Pushback

The response has been dramatic. Nations including Russia, Turkey, Hungary, and Pakistan have either banned or expelled Soros's organizations, citing national security concerns and alleged political interference. Hungary's controversial "Stop Soros law" specifically criminalizes assistance to undocumented migrants, targeting NGOs within his funding network. These actions raise compelling questions: Are these nations protecting their sovereignty, or silencing a force for democratic progress? The truth, as with many aspects of Soros's legacy, remains shrouded in mystery.

In the United States, George Soros's financial backing of progressive prosecutors and political campaigns has drawn intense scrutiny, with critics alleging these initiatives have contributed to a concerning surge in urban crime rates. His recent strategic investments in media organizations have only intensified the skepticism from those who suspect a calculated effort to shape public discourse according to his worldview.

The swirling controversies around Soros exist within a broader tapestry of conspiracy theories, antisemitic rhetoric, and the human tendency to seek simple explanations for complex problems.

Any examination of Soros's influence must confront an unsettling reality: the billionaire's name has become inextricably linked to a torrent of conspiracy theories and antisemitic narratives. Extremist groups propagate thoroughly debunked claims, such as the false assertion that Soros collaborated with Nazis (historians have definitively disproven this) or controls a shadowy "global Jewish cabal." These toxic narratives have had real-world consequences - the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter referenced Soros in his manifesto before his deadly rampage in 2018, and someone even targeted Soros's residence with pipe bombs.

While mainstream media outlets and fact-checking organizations have consistently dismantled outlandish claims about Soros, including fabricated stories about his arrest for election interference, these myths continue to proliferate through echo chambers on social media platforms.

The Bank of England: Soros and Bessent's Legendary Bet

The true extent of Soros's power manifested not in political spheres, but in the shadowy realm of international finance. September 16, 1992 - known as Black Wednesday - witnessed a financial coup orchestrated by Soros and his enigmatic protégé, Scott Bessent.

Britain was struggling to maintain the pound's position within the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM), tethered to the German mark. Behind the scenes, Soros's Quantum Fund methodically built a massive short position against sterling. Bessent, a brilliant 29-year-old strategist, proved instrumental - his mysterious intelligence network and relentless analysis convinced Soros to double their exposure to an astronomical $10 billion.

As the Bank of England desperately defended the pound, depleting reserves and raising rates, Soros and Bessent launched their calculated assault. The selling pressure proved insurmountable. By nightfall, Britain surrendered, abandoning the ERM as the pound plummeted. While Soros's fund reaped over $1 billion in profits, the British government suffered devastating losses both financially and politically. This watershed moment earned Soros the ominous title "The Man Who Broke the Bank of England," while marking Bessent as a financial mastermind destined for greater influence.

Quick Post from the sponsor of today’s Stroy: Republic

Looking for Stability in a Volatile Market?

Private infrastructure has outperformed public market equivalents by 86% on a 10-year annualized basis*—it’s no wonder why wealthy investors choose private markets.

With its highly selective, data-driven investment approach, Hamilton Lane’s Private Infrastructure Fund offers real ownership in the assets that are powering our future:

  • artificial intelligence

  • clean energy

  • logistics + trade

Hamilton Lane provides access to deals from the very best private markets funds in the world, and Class R of this offering has delivered 31.67% annualized performance since inception.*

Add these elite institutional-grade investments to your portfolio today for as little as $500. Learn more about Hamilton Lane Private Infrastructure Fund here.

*Source: Hamilton Lane data, Bloomberg as of January 2024. Past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.
All securities come with specific risks not limited to a total loss of your investment. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please review the risks specific to this investment on the HLPIF deal page hosted on Republic.com/hlpif

Philanthropy, Power, and Persistent Controversy

Through his Open Society Foundations, George Soros has channeled over $32 billion into a vast network of causes - from education reform to migration policy. Yet this philanthropic empire remains shrouded in controversy and speculation. Critics allege that Soros operates in the shadows, using his immense wealth to install progressive prosecutors across America, fund organizations critical of Israel, and covertly influence elections and public discourse worldwide. His activities have drawn intense scrutiny from EU parliamentary committees and U.S. watchdog groups, who continue probing the true reach and impact of his funding network.

Meanwhile, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) faces its own legitimacy crisis. An unlikely alliance of left and right-wing voices now demands its defunding, pointing to its alleged role in foreign revolutions, domestic censorship operations, and concerning lack of transparency. Even tech mogul Elon Musk has entered the fray, denouncing NED as "rife with corruption" and calling for its complete dissolution.

Family Succession and What Lies Ahead for the Open Society

Alexander Soros(left) with Joe Biden(Right)

In a pivotal 2023 transition, George Soros transferred control of his $25 billion foundation to his son Alexander Soros, sparking intense speculation about the future direction of the family's controversial activism. Early signs suggest continuity rather than change, with Alexander pledging to maintain OSF's role in promoting global democracy despite mounting opposition from critics and hostile governments.

What Does the Evidence Say?

Despite the numerous allegations against Soros, concrete evidence of illegal election interference or global manipulation remains elusive. His political donations and activism operate within legal frameworks, mirroring the practices of other major donors across the political spectrum. Research indicates that while OSF's billions in democracy promotion yield mixed results, its impact falls short of critics' most extreme claims.

A Controversial Figure of Today's World

As the complex narrative around George Soros continues to unfold, one undeniable truth emerges: his story remains far from complete. The billionaire philanthropist's influence on global politics and economics continues to spark intense debate, with each new development adding layers to an already intricate legacy.

The questions surrounding Soros's impact on democracy and global affairs persist, growing more nuanced with each passing year. His critics paint him as a puppet master pulling strings behind the scenes, while supporters defend his commitment to democratic values and open societies. Yet perhaps the most fascinating aspect of the Soros phenomenon is how it reflects our society's struggle to reconcile the role of private wealth in shaping public policy and democratic institutions.

Conclusion: Visionary or Villain?

The enigma of George Soros defies simple categorization. Is he truly a benevolent philanthropist advancing democracy, a shadowy globalist pulling strings from afar, or perhaps history's most misunderstood billionaire? Similarly, do organizations like NED and OSF strengthen democratic institutions—or sow chaos in their wake? The evidence remains as complex and controversial as Soros himself, whose influence has undeniably reshaped governments, empowered civil society actors, and ignited fierce debate.

As society grapples with fundamental questions about private wealth's role in democracy, foreign-funded NGOs, and the ethics of "democracy promotion," the Soros saga continues polarizing public opinion. His story mirrors our deepest anxieties about power, influence, and who truly controls global affairs. Is Soros truly the mastermind his detractors claim, orchestrating global events from the shadows? Or is he simply a successful financier using his wealth to promote causes he believes in, much like other billionaire philanthropists? The answers may lie somewhere in the murky waters between these extremes.

What's your view? Share your thoughts below.

Subscribe for More Insights

Want to dive deeper into fascinating stories like this. Subscribe to our newsletter for exclusive content, expert analyses, and actionable insights delivered straight to your inbox—join our community today and stay informed!